Tekno-İstilanın İş-Yaşam Dengesine Etkisinde Psikolojik Sağlamlığın Aracı Rolü

Yazarlar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63556/tisej.2025.1616

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Tekno-istila- İş yaşam dengesi- psikolojik sağlamlık- ulaşılabilir olmama- beyaz yakalı çalışanlar

Özet

Çalışmanın amacı, dijital teknolojilerin bireylerin özel yaşam sınırlarına nüfuz etmesiyle ortaya çıkan tekno-istila olgusunun iş-yaşam dengesi üzerindeki etkisini ortaya koymak ve bu ilişkide psikolojik sağlamlığın aracı rolünü incelemektedir. Araştırmanın ana kütlesini, İstanbul ve Kocaeli illerinde faaliyet gösteren orta ve büyük ölçekli işletmelerde istihdam edilen beyaz yakalı çalışanlar oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma kapsamında, 232 çalışandan anket yöntemiyle elde edilen veriler Smart PLS programı ile analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonucunda, tekno-istila arttıkça psikolojik sağlamlığın ve iş-yaşam dengesinin azaldığı tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca psikolojik sağlamlık arttıkça iş-yaşam dengesinin de arttığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Çalışmada, psikolojik sağlamlığın tekno-istila ve iş yaşam dengesi arasındaki ilişkide kısmı aracılık rolü olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu çalışma, bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin istilacı etkisini ifade eden tekno-istila olgusunun, çalışanların iş-yaşam dengesi üzerindeki olumsuz yansımalarını ortaya koyan öncül araştırmalardan biri olma niteliği taşımaktadır. Çalışan deneyiminin önceliklendiği günümüz iş dünyasında bu sonuç, tekno-istilanın psikolojik sağlamlık üzerindeki etkilerine dair literatüre önemli bir katkı sunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin çalışanların yaşamları üzerindeki etkisinin daha iyi anlaşılmasını derinleştirmekte ve psikolojik sağlamlığın önemini vurgulamaktadır. Beyaz yakalı çalışanların psikolojik sağlamlık düzeylerinin artırılması, dijital teknolojilerin yoğun kullanımı sonucu ortaya çıkan tekno-istila olgusunun olumsuz etkilerini azaltmada kritik bir stratejik insan kaynakları yönetimi uygulaması olarak değerlendirilmelidir.

Kaynaklar

Aleksić, D., Černe, M. ve Batistič, S. (2024). Understanding meaningful work in the context of technostress, COVID-19, frustration, and corporate social responsibility. Human Relations, 77(3), 426–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267221139776

Ammons, S. K. ve Markham, W. T. (2004). Working at home: Experiences of skilled white collar workers. Sociological Spectrum, 24(2), 191-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732170490271744

Apaydın, Ç. (2011). Öğretim üyelerinin işe bağımlılık düzeyi ile iş-yaşam dengesi ve iş-aile yaşam dengesi arasındaki ilişki. (Doktora tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Arlinghaus, A. ve Nachreiner, F. (2013). When work calls—Associations between being contacted outside of regular working hours for work-related matters and health. Chronobiology International, 30(9), 1197–1202. https://doi.org/10.3109/07420528.2013.800089

Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E. ve Fugate, M. (2000). All in A day's work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. The Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 472-491. https://doi.org/10.2307/259305

Barley, S. R., Meyerson, D. E. ve Grodal, S. (2011). E-mail as a source and symbol of stress. Organization Science, 22(4), 887–906. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0573

Bagozzi, R.P. ve Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Jams, 16, 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327

Baron, R. M. ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173

Bayramoğlu, G. (2018). İş/aile sınırı teorisi bağlamında kadın akademisyenlerin iş/yaşam dengesinin sağlanmasına yönelik bir araştırma. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17(68), 1722-1744. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.433355

Bernuzzi, C., Sommovigo, V. ve Setti, I. (2022). The role of resilience in the work-life interface: A systematic review. WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 73(4), 1239–1251. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-205023

Brailovskaia, J., Siegel, J., Precht, L.-M., Friedrichs, S., Schillack, H. ve Margraf, J. (2024). Less smartphone and more physical activity for a better work satisfaction, motivation, work-life balance, and mental health: An experimental intervention study. Acta Psychologica, 250, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104494

Borle, P., Reichel, K., Niebuhr, F. ve Voelter-Mahlknecht, S. (2021). How are techno-stressors associated with mental health and work outcomes? A systematic review of occupational exposure to information and communication technologies within the technostress model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8673. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168673

Brough, P., Timms, C., O’Driscoll, M. P., Kalliath, T., Siu, O. ve Sit, C. (2014). Work-life balance: A longitudinal evaluation of a new measure across Australia and New Zealand workers. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(19), 2724–2744. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.899262

Byrne, J. ve Canato, A. (2017). It’s been a hard day’s night: Work family interface and employee engagement. Organizational Dynamics, 46(2), 104-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2017.04.006

Cambier, R., Derks, D. ve Vlerick, P. (2019). Detachment from work: A diary study on telepressure, smartphone use and empathy. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 227-245. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.477

Chen, Y., Wang, X., Benitez, J., Luo, X. R. ve Li, D. (2022). Does techno-invasion lead to employees’ deviant behaviors? Journal of Management Information Systems, 39(2), 454–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2022.2063557

Cheng, H.-L., Lin, T.-C., Tan, W.-K. ve Chiu, C.-M. (2021). Understanding employees’ response to work-related after-hours use of instant messaging apps: A stress and coping perspective. Online Information Review, 45(7), 1247–1267. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-06-2020-0214

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Crocetta, C., Antonucci, L., Cataldo, R., Galasso, R., Grassia, M. G., Lauro, C. N. ve Marino, M. (2021). Higher-order PLS-PM approach for different types of constructs. Social Indicators Research, 154, 725-754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02563-w

Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700536001

Cohen, L., Manion, L. ve Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge.

Derks, D., Bakker, A. B., Peters, P. ve van Wingerden, P. (2016). Work-related smartphone use, work–family conflict and family role performance: the role of segmentation preference. Human Relations, 69(5), 1045-1068. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715601890

Ditchburn, G. ve Koh, R. E. (2024). Workplace pressure, employee stress, mental well-being and resilience in response to COVID-19 in Singapore. Evidence-based HRM, 12(2), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-10-2022-0252

Doğan, T. (2015). Kısa psikolojik sağlamlık ölçeğinin Türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being, 3(1), 93-102.

Dutta, D. ve Mishra, S. K. (2024). “Technology is killing me!”: The moderating effect of organization home-work interface on the linkage between technostress and stress at work. Information Technology & People, 37(6), 2203–2222. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-03-2022-0169

EPRS. (2021). Thinking about future EU policy, the future of work – Trends, challenges and potential initiatives. Briefing. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2021)679097 (Erişim Tarihi:9 Temmuz 2025).

Fernández-Fernández, M., Martínez-Navalón, J.-G., Gelashvili, V. ve Prado Román, C. (2023). The impact of teleworking technostress on satisfaction, anxiety and performance. Heliyon, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17201

Franken, E., Plimmer, G. ve Malinen, S. (2020). Paradoxical leadership in public sector organizations: Its role in fostering employee resilience. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 79(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12396

Fornell, C. ve Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1). 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437810180010

Gaudioso, F., Turel, O. ve Galimberti, C. (2017). The mediating roles of strain facets and coping strategies in translating techno-stressors into adverse job outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.041

Giurge, L. M. ve Bohns, V. K. (2021). You don’t need to answer right away! Receivers overestimate how quickly senders expect responses to non-urgent work emails. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 167, 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.08.002

Gupta, P. ve Srivastava, S. (2021). Work-life conflict and burnout among working women: A mediated moderated model of support and resilience. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29(3), 629–655. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-12-2019-1993

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M. ve Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hair, J. F., Black, C. W., Babin, B. J. ve Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis. Harlow: Pearson.

Harris, K. J., Harris, R. B., Valle, M., Carlson, J., Carlson, D. S., Zivnuska, S. ve Wiley, B. (2022). Technostress and the entitled employee: Impacts on work and family. Information Technology & People, 35(3), 1073–1095. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2019-0348

Henseler, J., Ringle, C, M. ve Sinkovics, R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In Sinkovics, R. ve Ghauri, P. (Eds.), New challenges to international marketing (p. 277 – 319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. ve Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-

Hill, E. J., Hawkins, A. J., Ferris, M. ve Weitzman, M. (2001). Finding an extra day a week: The positive influence of perceived job flexibility on work and family life balance. Family Relations, 50(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00049.x

Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(3), 337–

421. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00062

Hurbean, L., Dospinescu, O., Munteanu, V. ve Danaiata, D. (2022). Effects of instant messaging related technostress on work performance and well-being. Electronics, 11(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11162535

Ilgaz, G., Özgür, H. ve Çuhadar, C. (2016). The adaptation of technostress scale into Turkish. Abstracts of the 11th International Balkan Education and Science Congress, Poreč, Croatia.

Johnson, S. J., Willis, S. M. ve Evans, J. (2019). An examination of stressors, strain, and resilience in academic and non-academic U.K. university job roles. International Journal of Stress Management, 26(2), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000096

Kıcır, K. G. ve Tütüncüoğlu, C. (2024). İş yaşam dengesi, psikolojik dayanıklılık ve kariyer tatmini arasındaki ilişki: Özel sektör işletmelerinde bir analiz. Biga İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(3), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.70754/biibfd.1523212

Kim, M. ve Windsor, C. (2015). Resilience and work-life balance in first-line nurse manager. Asian Nursing Research, 9(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2014.09.003

Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101

Köse, S., Baykal, B. ve Kiroglu Bayat, İ. (2021). Mediator role of resilience in the relationship between social support and work life balance. Australian Journal of Psychology, 73(3), 316-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2021.1895678

Krisor, S. M., Diebig, M. ve Rowold, J. (2015). Is cortisol as a biomarker of stress influenced by the interplay of work-family conflict, work-family balance and resilience? Personnel Review, 44(4), 648–661. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-09-2013-0168

Kumar, P. S. (2024). Technostress: A comprehensive literature review on dimensions, impacts, and management strategies. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100475

Kuntz, J. R. C., Näswall, K. ve Malinen, S. (2016). Resilient employees in resilient organizations: Flourishing beyond adversity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(2), 456–462. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2016.39

Lee, S., Zhou, Z. E., Xie, J. ve Guo, H. (2021). Work-related use of information and communication technologies after hours and employee fatigue: The exacerbating effect of affective commitment. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 36(6), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-12-2019-0677

Lițan, D.-E. (2025). Mental health in the “era” of artificial intelligence: Technostress and the perceived impact on anxiety and depressive disorders-An SEM analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1600013

Ma, J., Ollier-Malaterre, A. ve Lu, C.-Q. (2021). The impact of techno-stressors on work–life balance: The moderation of job self-efficacy and the mediation of emotional exhaustion. Computers in Human Behavior, 122. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106811

Mansour, S., Mohanna, D. ve Tremblay, D.G. (2022). The dark side of hyperconnectivity in the accounting profession. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 18(5), 685-703. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-12-2020-0211

Marthalina, M., Joeliaty, J., Yunizar, Y. ve Soemaryani, I. (2025). Work-life balance woman working in the government sector. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-03-2024-4372

Mokhtar, A. ve Mohamad Yunus, N. (2024). The Mediating Effects of Resilience on Technostress Creator and Employee’s Well-Being in Financial Industries Within Klang Valley. Advances in Business Research International Journal, 10(2), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.24191/abrij.v10i2.4647

Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J. ve Posakoff, N. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879–903.

Parlement Européen. (2021). Résolution du Parlement européen du 21 janvier 2021 contenant des recommandations à la Commission sur le droit à la déconnexion. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0021_FR.html (Erişim Tarihi: 9 Temmuz 2025).

Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S. ve Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165

Ramesh, R., Ananthram, S., Vijayalakshmi, V. ve Sharma, P. (2022). Technostressors – a boon or bane? Toward an integrative conceptual model. Journal of Indian Business Research, 14(3), 278–300. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-10-2021-0348

Rees, C. S., Breen, L. J., Cusack, L. ve Hegney, D. (2015). Understanding ındividual resilience in the

workplace: The international collaboration of workforce resilience model. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00073

Ringle, PDC 2024. Fit measures in SmartPLS. Retrieved from https://www.smartpls.com/documentation/algorithms-and- techniques/model-fit/ (Erişim Tarihi: 9 Temmuz 2025).

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M. ve Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In H. C., K. M. ve V. A. (Eds.), Handbook of market research. Springer.

Samimi Dehkordi, S., Radević, I., Černe, M., Božič, K. ve Lamovšek, A. (2025). The three‐way interaction of autonomy, openness to experience, and techno‐invasion in predicting employee creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 59(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.679

Sarker, S., Sarker, S., Xiao, X. ve Ahuja, M. (2012). Managing employees’ use of mobile technologies to minimize work-life balance impacts. MIS Quarterly Executive, 11(4), 143–157. https://ir.library.louisville.edu/faculty/359

Schlachter, S., McDowall, A., Cropley, M. ve İnceoglu, İ. (2018). Voluntary work-related technology use during non-work time: A narrative synthesis of empirical research and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(4), 825–846. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12165

Sharma, I., Tiwari, V., Gupta, S. ve Rana, N. P. (2025). Examining the nexus between technostress and turnover intention: The moderating influence of PsyCap in Indian information management contexts. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 38(2), 450–473. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-08-2023-0434

Syvertsen, T. (2020). You are the problem! Everybody online and self-regulation. In T. Syvertsen (Ed.), Digital detox: The politics of disconnecting (pp. 49-71). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-339-520201004

Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S. ve Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007). The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301–328. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109

Tarafdar, M., Bolman Pullins, E. ve Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2014). Examining impacts of technostress on the professional salesperson’s behavioural performance. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 34(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853134.2013.870184

Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, T. S. ve Ragu-Nathan, B. S. (2011). Crossing to the dark side:Examining creators, outcomes, and inhibitors of technostress. Communications of the ACM, 54(9), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1145/1995376.199540

Ter Hoeven, C. L., van Zoonen, W. ve Fonner, K. L. (2016). The practical paradox of technology: The influence of communication technology use on employee burnout and engagement. Communication Monographs, 83(2), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1133920

Tugade, M.M. ve Fredrickson, B.L. (2007). Regulation of positive emotions: emotion regulation strategies that promote resilience. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(3), 311-333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9015-4

Turel, O., Serenko, A. ve Bontis, N. (2011). Family and work-related consequences of addiction to organizational pervasive technologies. Information & Management, 48, 88-95.

Wang, Q. ve Yao, N. (2025). Understanding the impact of technology usage at work on academics’ psychological well-being: A perspective of technostress. BMC Psychology, 13, 130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02461-1

Wayne, J. H., Matthews, R., Crawford, W. ve Casper, W. J. (2020). Predictors and processes of satisfaction with work–family balance: Examining the role of personal, work, and family resources and conflict and enrichment. Human Resource Management, 59(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21971

Wu, J., Guo, S. ve Song, M. (2022). Techno-invasion and job satisfaction in China: The roles of boundary preference for segmentation and marital status. Human Systems Management, 41(6), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-211595

Werneburg, B. L., Jenkins, S. M., Friend, J. L., Berkland, B. E., Clark, M. M., Rosedahl, J. K., ... Sood, A. (2018). Improving resiliency in healthcare employees. American Journal of Health Behavior, 42(1), 39- 50. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.42.1.4

Wong, K. K. K. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using smartpls. Marketing Bulletin, 24(1), 1-32.

Wu, J., Wang, N., Mei, W. ve Liu, L. (2017). Does techno-invasion trigger job anxiety? Moderating effects of computer self-efficacy and perceived organizational support. WHICEB 2017 Proceedings, 42. https://aisel.aisnet.org/whiceb2017/42

Yang, Y., Shamim, S., De Massis, A. ve Gao, D. (2025). Defensive routines as coping mechanisms against technostress: Roles of digital leadership and employee goal orientation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124143

Yue, C. A. (2022). The paradox of using public social media for work: The influence of after-hours work communication on employee outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 149, 748–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.079

İndir

Yayınlanmış

22-09-2025

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

YILDIZ, F. Z. (2025). Tekno-İstilanın İş-Yaşam Dengesine Etkisinde Psikolojik Sağlamlığın Aracı Rolü. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 60(3), 2851–2875. https://doi.org/10.63556/tisej.2025.1616

Sayı

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Benzer Makaleler

<< < 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 > >> 

Bu makale için ayrıca gelişmiş bir benzerlik araması başlat yapabilirsiniz.