Sustainability and Shock Resilience: A TVP-VAR Analysis of the Resilience of ESG Firms

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63556/tisej.2026.1636

Keywords:

Sustainability (ESG), Geopolitical Risk, Time-Varying Parameter VAR (TVP-VAR), Bayesian Structural Time Series (BSTS), Volatility Spillover

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of country-specific and global geopolitical risks, along with their subcomponents, on the Turkish stock market, and examines the resilience of firms that comply with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria in the face of such risks. Using monthly data for the period between January 2015 and June 2025, ESG-compliant firms are compared with non-ESG firms. The analysis also evaluates the resilience of Turkish firms to major geopolitical shocks, including the Covid-19 pandemic and the Russia–Ukraine war. In line with the research objectives, Time-Varying Parameter Vector Autoregression (TVP-VAR), Bayesian Structural Time Series (BSTS) analysis, and Quantile-on-Quantile Regression (QQR) methods are employed to assess interconnectedness and volatility spillovers. The findings reveal no significant evidence supporting the notion that ESG practices shield firms from geopolitical shocks. Particularly in the long run, ESG-compliant firms appear to act more as volatility receivers compared to non-ESG firms and are subject to higher levels of volatility. Another key finding shows that the impact of geopolitical risks on stock markets varies across different time horizons. Among the uncertainty indices considered, only the global geopolitical risk index acts as a volatility transmitter, while other geopolitical risk indices and both ESG and non-ESG stock indices serve as volatility receivers. The study offers important implications for policymakers and investors concerning the risk management dimension of ESG investments.

References

Alnafrah, I. (2024). ESG Practices Mitigating Geopolitical Risks: Implications for Sustainable Environmental Management, Journal of Environmental Management, 358, 120923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120923

Alqahtani, A., Hammoudeh, S., & Selmi, R. (2022). Relationship between Different Sources of Geopolitical Risks and Stock Markets in The GCC Region: A Dynamic Correlation Analysis, Review of Behavioral Finance, 14(2), 296-316. https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-07-2019-0099

Altın, F. G., Gürsoy, S., Doğan, M., & Ergüney, E. B. (2023). The Analysis of the Relationship Among Climate Policy Uncertainty, Logistic Firm Stock Returns and ESG Scores: Evidence from the TVP-VAR Model, İstatistik Araştırma Dergisi, 13(2). 42-59. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jsstr

Antonakakis, N., & Gabauer, D. (2017). Refined Measures of Dynamic Connectedness Based on TVP-VAR. MRPA. Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/78282/

Apergis, N., Poufinas, T., & Antonopoulos, A. (2022). ESG Scores and Cost of Debt, Energy Economics, 112, 106186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106186

Bouras, C., Christou, C., Gupta, R., & Suleman, T. (2019). Geopolitical Risks, Returns, and Volatility in Emerging Stock Markets: Evidence from A Panel GARCH Model, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(8), 1841-1856. DOI 10.1080/1540496X.2018.1507906

Brodersen, K. H., Gallusser, F., Koehler, J., Remy, N., & Scott, S. L. (2015). Inferring Causal Impact Using Bayesian Structural Time-Series Models, The Annals of Applied Statistics, 9(1), 247-274. DOI: 10.1214/14-AOAS788

Chaudhry, I. S., Faheem, M., Farooq, F., & Sajid, A. (2021). Financial Development and Natural Resources Dynamics in Saudi Arabia: Visiting ‘Resource Curse Hypothesis’ by NARDL and Wavelet-Based Quantile-on-Quantile Approach, Review of Economics and Development Studies, 7(1), 101.

Çetenak, E. H., Aytaç, A., ve Yağlı, İ. (2023). Çevresel, Sosyal ve Kurumsal Yönetişim (ESG) Değerlerinin Banka Performansı Üzerine Etkisi: ABD Bankaları Örneği, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 32(2), 424-434. https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1136191

Das, D., Kannadhasan, M., & Bhattacharyya, M. (2019). Do the Emerging Stock Markets React To International Economic Policy Uncertainty, Geopolitical Risk And Financial Stress A like?, The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 48, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2019.01.008

Diebold, F. X. & Yılmaz, K. (2014). On the Network Topology of Variance Decompositions: Measuring the Connectedness of Financial Firms, Journal of Econometrics, 182(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2014.04.012

Doğan, M., Kevser, M., ve Altınay, A. T. (2022). ESG Skorları ile Firma Performansı Arasındaki İlişki: BRICS Ülkelerinden Kanıtlar, Finans Sempozyumu Bildiri Kitabı, 396-408.

Erben Yavuz, A. (2023) ESG Skorlarının Firma Karlılığı Üzerindeki Etkisi: Borsa İstanbul Örneği, Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 58(3), 2686-2701. https://doi.org/10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.09.2253

Fiorillo, P., Meles, A., Pellegrino, L. R., & Verdoliva, V. (2024). Geopolitical Risk and Stock Price Crash Risk: The Mitigating Role of ESG Performance, International Review of Financial Analysis, 91, 102958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102958

Gao, M., & Geng, X. (2024). The Role of ESG Performance During Times of COVID-19 Pandemic, Scientific Reports, 14(1), 2553. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52245-7

Genç, M. (2025). Sürdürülebilirlik Performansının Finansal Tablolara Etkisi. Işık, Y. ve Kurt, G. (Ed.), Sürdürülebilir İşletmeler İçin Muhasebe Yaklaşımları. Gazi Kitabevi, Ankara.

Iannone, B., Duttilo, P., & Gattone, S. A. (2025). Evaluating the Resilience of ESG Investments in European Markets During Turmoil Periods, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(4). 5006-5020. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3225

Karyağdı, N. G., ve Şit, A. (2023). İşletmelerin ESG Performanslarının Sermaye Maliyeti ve Finansal Performansına Etkisi: BİST Sürdürebilirlik-25 Endeksi Üzerine Bir Uygulama, Bucak İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 277-292. https://doi.org/10.38057/bifd.1362050

Katsampoxakis, I., Xanthopoulos, S., Basdekis, C., & Christopoulos, A. G. (2024). Can ESG Stocks be A Safe Haven During Global Crises? Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic and The Russia-Ukraine War with Time-Frequency Wavelet Analysis, Economies, 12(4), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12040089

Koop, G., & Korobilis, D. (2010). Bayesian Multivariate Time Series Methods for Empirical Macroeconomics. Boston, Foundations and Trends® in Econometrics

Koop, G., Pesaran, M. H., & Potter, S. M. (1996). Impulse Response Analysis in Nonlinear Multivariate Models, Journal of Econometrics, 74(1), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(95)01753-4

Krüger, P. (2015). Corporate Goodness and Shareholder Wealth, Journal of Financial Economics, 115(2), 304–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.008

Li, H., Zhang, X., & Zhao, Y. (2022). ESG and Firm's Default Risk, Finance Research Letters, 47, 102713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102713

Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility During the Financial Crisis, Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785–1824. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12505

Naffa, H., & Dudás, F. (2024). Does ESG Improve Crisis Resilience? Empirical Evidence of Global Emerging Equity Markets During the Covid-19 Crisis, Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 32(1), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.19147

Nofsinger, J., & Varma, A. (2014). Socially Responsible Funds and Market Crises, Journal of Banking & Finance, 48, 180-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.12.016

Pastor, Ľ., Stambaugh, R. F., & Taylor, L. A. (2021). Sustainable Investing in Equilibrium, Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 550–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.12.011

Pesaran, H. H., & Shin, Y. (1998). Generalized Impulse Response Analysis in Linear Multivariate Models, Economics Letters, 58(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(97)00214-0

Primiceri, G. E. (2005). Time Varying Structural Vector Autoregressions and Monetary Policy, The Review of Economic Studies, 72(3), 821–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2005.00353.x

Reyad, H. M., Ayesha, M., Iqbal, M. M., & Zariyawati, M. A. (2024). The Role of ESG in Enhancing Firm Resilience to Geopolitical Risks: An Eastern European Perspective, Business Strategy & Development, 7(4), e70027. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.70027

Ricci, O., Santilli, G., Scardozzi, G., & Lopes, F. S. S. (2024). ESG Resilience in Conflictual Times. Research in International Business and Finance, 71, 102411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102411

Saini, M., Yadav, M., Agoba, A. M., Danso, A., & Adu‐Ameyaw, E. (2025). Geopolitical Risk, Market Indices, and ESG Performance During Crises, Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70080

Sim, N., & Zhou, H. (2015). Oil prices, US Stock Return, and the Dependence Between Their Quantiles, Journal of Banking & Finance, 55, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.01.013

Sinha, A., Ghosh, V., Hussain, N., Nguyen, D. K., & Das, N. (2023). Green Financing of Renewable Energy Generation: Capturing the Role of Exogenous Moderation for ensuring Sustainable Development, Energy Economics, 126, 107021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107021

Şahin, E., Irmak F., ve Konak F. (2023). Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Skorları ile Özkaynak ve Borç Maliyetleri Arasındaki İlişki. Polat, M., Öztaş, S. ve Özdemir, A. (Ed.) Toplum ve Ekonomi. Eğitim Yayınevi, Konya.

Şeker, Y., ve Şengür, E. D. (2022). Çevresel, Sosyal ve Kurumsal Yönetim (ESG) Performansı: Uluslararası Bir Araştırma, Muhasebe ve Vergi Uygulamaları Dergisi. 15(2), 349-387. https://doi.org/10.29067/muvu.1066216

Şişman, M. E., ve Çankaya, S. (2021). Çevresel, Sosyal ve Kurumsal Yönetişim (ESG) Verilerinin Firmaların Finansal Performansına Etkisi: Hava Yolu Sektörü Üzerine Bir Çalışma, Çukurova Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 73-91. https://doi.org/10.51945/cuiibfd.880468

Published

20.03.2026

How to Cite

IRMAK, F. (2026). Sustainability and Shock Resilience: A TVP-VAR Analysis of the Resilience of ESG Firms. Third Sector Social Economic Review, 61(1), 80–105. https://doi.org/10.63556/tisej.2026.1636

Issue

Section

Research Article

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.