The Impact of the Semantic Transformation of the Concept of Gender on Women’s Policies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63556/tisej.2026.1920Keywords:
Gender, ontological transformation, public policy analysis, women’s policies, discursive institutionalismAbstract
This study examines the reflections of the ontological transformation of the concept of “gender” in the social sciences literature on women’s policies within the framework of public policy analysis. It also seeks to answer, through the case of Türkiye, the question of whether abandoning the use of the concept of “gender” in public policy documents corresponds to a policy change or to policy continuity. The study attempts to explain the conceptual transformation and the policy problem through contextual discourse analysis conducted on the basis of the discursive institutionalism approach. Accordingly, while the concept of gender was initially used within a structure of meaning shaped around a focus on “women,” from the 1990s onward the meaning framework of the concept began to transform under the influence of postmodernism and queer approaches. In this process, the concept of gender was reconfigured within a new ontological ground that includes LGBTQ and defines gender along the axis of multiple and fluid “gender identities.” The study finds that this transformation did not remain only at the theoretical level, but also became institutionalized through academic literature and international legal texts. The findings demonstrate that the removal of the concept of “gender” from policy documents in some countries, contrary to interpretations focusing on the terminological use of the concept, does not indicate a regression or discontinuity in the field of women’s rights; rather, it may be regarded as a deliberate strategy of continuity aimed at sustaining women’s policies with a focus on “women.” In this context, the case of Türkiye reveals that the removal of the concept from policy documents does not represent a policy rupture; rather, it may be considered a strategy that enables the continuation of women’s policies with a focus on “women.” Consequently, the study demonstrates the necessity of considering not only the terminological use of concepts in policy analysis, but also the ontological and epistemic foundations on which they are based; and shows that this approach is decisive in terms of preserving the continuity of women-centered policies and ensuring analytical consistency.
References
Blank, A. (1999). Why Do New Meanings Occur? A Cognitive Typology Of The Motivations For Lexical Semantic Change. A. Blank ve P. Koch (Ed.), Historical Semantics And Cognition içinde (s. 61–90). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Bowker, G. C. ve Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting Things Out: Classification And Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bundesverfassungsgericht. (2017). Order Of 10 October 2017 - 1 BvR 2019/16.
Butler, J. (2008). Cinsiyet Belası: Feminizm Ve Kimliğin Altüst Edilmesi (B. Ertür, Çev.). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
Butler, J. (2021, 23 Ekim). Why Is The Idea Of ‘Gender’ Provoking Backlash The World Over? The Guardian. Erişim adresi: https://www.theguardian.com/
Council of the European Union. (2000). Council Directive 2000/78/EC Of 27 November 2000 Establishing A General Framework For Equal Treatment In Employment And Occupation.
Council of Europe. (2011). Council Of Europe Convention On Preventing And Combating Violence Against Women And Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention).
Davis, J. A. ve Smith, T. W. (1992). General Social Surveys, 1972–1991: Cumulative Codebook. Chicago: NORC.
de Beauvoir, S. (2019). İkinci Cinsiyet (G. Acar Savran, Çev.). İstanbul: Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları. (Orijinal eser 1949’da yayımlandı)
Eray-Sarıtaş, Ş. (2025). Türkiye’de Toplumsal Cinsiyet Eşitliği Kamu Politikası: Yeni Kurumsalcı Yaklaşımlar Çerçevesinden 1980–2015 Yılları Arası. Ankara: Divan Kitap.
Eray-Sarıtaş, Ş. (2023). Türkiye’nin Cinsiyet Eşitliği Politikalarında Kurumsal Dönüşüm (1998–2005): Yasal Reform Dönemi. S. Kablay (Ed.), Toplumsal Yaşamda Kadın içinde (s. 25–44). Ankara: Nobel Bilimsel Eserler.
European Commission. (2020). A Union Of Equality: LGBTIQ Equality Strategy 2020–2025. Brussels: European Commission.
European Parliament. (2019). The Backlash Against Gender Equality And Women’s And Girls’ Rights. Brussels: European Parliament.
European Union. (2000). Charter Of Fundamental Rights Of The European Union.
Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing The Body: Gender Politics And The Construction Of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.
Finnemore, M. (1996). National Interests In International Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Finnemore, M. ve Sikkink, K. (1998). International Norm Dynamics And Political Change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917.
Foucault, M. (2007). Cinselliğin Tarihi 1: Bilme İstenci (H. U. Tanrıöver, Çev.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
Fraser, N. (2013). Fortunes Of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism To Neoliberal Crisis. London: Verso.
Geeraerts, D. (2010). Theories Of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Government of Canada. (2019). Government Of Canada Introduces “X” Gender Identifier. Erişim adresi: https://www.canada.ca/
Graff, A. ve Korolczuk, E. (2022). Anti-Gender Politics In The Populist Moment. London: Routledge.
Halperin, D. M. (2003). The Normalization Of Queer Theory. Journal Of Homosexuality, 45(2–4), 339–343.
Harris, K. M. vd. (2019). The National Longitudinal Study Of Adolescent To Adult Health: Research Design. Erişim adresi: https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21600.v21
Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, And The State. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.
Hines, S. (2020). The Feminist Frontier: On Trans And Feminism. Journal Of Gender Studies, 29(2), 141–152.
ILGA-Europe. (2021). Annual Review Of The Human Rights Situation Of LGBTI People In Europe And Central Asia.
International Civil Aviation Organization. (2015). Machine Readable Travel Documents (Doc 9303). Montreal: ICAO.
Jeffreys, S. (2014). Gender Hurts: A Feminist Analysis Of The Politics Of Transgenderism. London: Routledge.
Keck, M. E. ve Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks In International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Kraft, M. E. ve Furlong, S. R. (2004). Public Policy: Politics, Analysis, And Alternatives (2. Baskı). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Kuhar, R. ve Paternotte, D. (2017). Anti-Gender Campaigns In Europe: Mobilizing Against Equality. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure Of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Laqueur, T. (1990). Making Sex: Body And Gender From The Greeks To Freud. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Marlar, J. (2023). Asking Inclusive Questions About Gender.
Marlar, J. ve Willcoxon, Z. (2023). Measuring Diverse Gender Identities.
Oakley, A. (1972). Sex, Gender And Society. London: Temple Smith.
Money, J. (1955). Hermaphroditism, Gender And Precocity In Hyperadrenocorticism. Bulletin Of The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 96, 253–264.
National Academies Of Sciences, Engineering, And Medicine. (2022). Measuring Sex, Gender Identity, And Sexual Orientation. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust In Numbers: The Pursuit Of Objectivity In Science And Public Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Preciado, P. B. (2008). Testo Junkie: Sex, Drugs, And Biopolitics In The Pharmacopornographic Era. New York: The Feminist Press.
Saussure, F. de. (2011). Course In General Linguistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power Of Ideas And Discourse. Annual Review Of Political Science, 11, 303–326.
Schmidt, V. A. (2010). Taking Ideas And Discourse Seriously. European Political Science Review, 2(1), 1–25.
Scott, J. W. (1986). Gender: A Useful Category Of Historical Analysis. American Historical Review, 91(5), 1053–1075.
Smith, T. W. vd. (2019). General Social Surveys, 1972–2018: Cumulative Codebook. Chicago: NORC.
Stryker, S. (2008). Transgender History. Berkeley: Seal Press.
West, C. ve Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing Gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.
Wetherell, M., Taylor, S. ve Yates, S. J. (Ed.). (2001). Discourse As Data: A Guide For Analysis. London: SAGE Publications.
United Nations. (1995). Beijing Declaration And Platform For Action.
U.S. Department Of State. (2022). Gender Marker X.
Yogyakarta Principles. (2007). The Yogyakarta Principles.
Yogyakarta Principles. (2017). The Yogyakarta Principles Plus 10.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Third Sector Social Economic Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
