Formel ve İnformel Bakım Verenlerin Yaşlı Bakım Hizmetlerinde Robotik Teknolojileri Kullanım Niyeti

Alaiad, A., & Zhou, L. (2014). The determinants of home healthcare robots adoption: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(11), 825–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.07.003

Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., & Zoghbi, S. (2009). Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3

Bedaf, S., Gelderblom, G. J., & de Witte, L. (2015). Overview and categorization of robots supporting independent living of elderly people: What activities do they support and how far have they developed. Assistive Technology, 27(2), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2014.978916

Broadbent, E., Tamagawa, C., Patience, A., Knock, B., Kerse, N., Day, K., & MacDonald, B. A. (2012). Attitudes towards health-care robots in a retirement village. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 31(2), 115-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6612.2011.00551.x

Bursa Yatırım Destek Ofisi. (t.y.). Neden Bursa? Erişim adresi: https://bursainvest.gov.tr/tr/neden-bursa/ (Erişim tarihi: 20.02.2026)

Charmes, J. (2019). The unpaid care work and the labour market: An analysis of time use data based on the latest world compilation of time-use surveys. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office.

Coco, K., Kangasniemi, M., & Rantanen, T. (2018). Care personnel’s attitudes and fears toward care robots in elderly care: A comparison of data from the care personnel in Finland and Japan. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 50(6), 634-644. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12435

Çonka, B. (2024). Multifaceted analysis of older adults’ and caretakers’ attitudes toward social robots (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Bilkent Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Daştan, B. ve Hintistan, S. (2021). Yaşlı bakımında ortam destekli yaşam teknolojilerinin kullanımı: Geleneksel derleme. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Nursing Sciences, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.5336/nurses.2021-81726

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

de Graaf, M. M. A., ben Allouch, S., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2019). Why would I use this in my home? A model of domestic social robot acceptance. Human-Computer Interaction, 34(2), 115–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2017.1312406

DeepL SE. (2026). DeepL Translator [Çevrimiçi makine çevirisi aracı]. Erişim adresi: https://www.deepl.com

Draper, H., Sorell, T., Bedaf, S., Syrdal, D. S., Gutierrez-Ruiz, C., Duclos, A., & Amirabdollahian, F. (2014). Ethical dimensions of human-robot interactions in the care of older people: Insights from 21 focus groups convened in UK, France and the Netherlands. Social Robotics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8755, 135-145.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385

Erebak, S. & Turgut, T. (2018). Robots as our new coworkers: The influence of anthropomorphism on employees’ preference of levels of automation. İş’te Davranış Dergisi, 1(3), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.25203/idd.352463

Erebak, S., & Turgut, T. (2019). Caregivers’ attitudes toward potential robot coworkers in elder care. Cognition, Technology and Work, 21(2), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0512-0

Frennert, S., Aminoff, H., & Östlund, B. (2020). Technological frames and care robots in eldercare. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(2), 311-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00641-0

Google. (2026). NotebookLM [Yapay zekâ destekli not alma ve metin işleme aracı]. Erişim adresi: https://notebooklm.google.com

Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., & Wielinga, B. (2010). Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: The Almere model. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2(4), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0068-5

Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Hofstede, B. M., Askari, S. I., Lukkien, D., Gosetto, L., Alberts, J. W., Tesfay, E. ... Nap, H. H. (2025). A field study to explore user experiences with socially assistive robots for older adults: emphasizing the need for more interactivity and personalisation. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2025.1537272

Huzurevleri ile Huzurevi Yaşlı Bakım ve Rehabilitasyon Merkezleri Yönetmeliği (2001). T.C. Resmî Gazete, Sayı: 24325, 21 Şubat 2001.

Ide, H., Suwa, S., Akuta, Y., Kodate, N., Tsujimura, M., Ishimaru, M. ... Yu, W. (2024). Developing a model to explain users’ ethical perceptions regarding the use of care robots in home care: A cross-sectional study in Ireland, Finland, and Japan. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2023.105137

Johansson-Pajala, R. M., Thommes, K., Hoppe, J. A., Tuisku, O., Hennala, L., Pekkarinen, S. ... Gustafsson, C. (2020). Care robot orientation: What, who and how? Potential users’ perceptions. International Journal of Social Robotics, 12(5), 1103–1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00619-y

Lee, S. H., Kim, J. S., & Yu, S. (2025). The impact of care robots on older adults: A systematic review. Geriatric Nursing, 65, 103507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2025.103507

Moyle, W., Jones, C., Cooke, M., O’Dwyer, S., Sung, B., & Drummond, S. (2014). Connecting the person with dementia and family: a feasibility study of a telepresence robot. BMC Geriatrics, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-7

Nield, L., Jackson, C., Tarpani, R. R. Z., Story, M., di Nuovo, A., & Fowler-Davis, S. (2026). What social and environmental considerations are important for socially assistive robotic adoption for pre-frail older adults at home: a scoping review, life cycle assessment and survey. BMC Geriatrics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06892-8

Nolan, A. (2021). Making life richer, easier and healthier: Robots, their future and public policy (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 117). Paris: OECD Publishing.

Nomura, T., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., & Kato, K. (2006). Measurement of negative attitudes toward robots. Interaction Studies, 7(3), 437-454. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.7.3.14nom

OECD. (2025). Health at a glance 2025: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/8f9e3f98-en

OECD. (t.y.). Ageing and long-term care. Erişim adresi: https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/ageing-and-long-term-care.html

Özkurt, V. (2018). Bakım sürecinde geronteknolojinin etkin kullanımı: bakım verenlerin algılarına ilişkin nitel bir çalışma (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Antalya.

Parks, J. A. (2010). Lifting the burden of women’s care work: Should robots replace the “human touch”? Hypatia, 25(1), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01086.x

Parviainen, J., Turja, T., & Van Aerschot, L. (2019). Social robots and human touch in care: The perceived usefulness of robot assistance among healthcare professionals. In O. Korn (Ed.), Social Robots: Technological, Societal and Ethical Aspects of Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 187-204). Cham: Springer Nature.

Pino, M., Boulay, M., Jouen, F., & Rigaud, A. S. (2015). Are we ready for robots that care for us? Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 7, 141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00141

Reegård, K., Fernandes, A., & Bloch, M. (2025). Perceptions of technology-related job insecurity among healthcare personnel: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Social Robotics, 17, 1693-1705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-025-01283-w

Robinson, H., MacDonald, B. A., Kerse, N., & Broadbent, E. (2013). Suitability of healthcare robots for a dementia unit and suggested improvements. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 14(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2012.09.006

Samuel, G., Correa, M., Todd, C., & Tinker, A. (2023). What contribution do robots make to the care of older people? A scoping review. Gerontechnology, 22(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2023.22.2.sam.08

Sharkey, A. & Sharkey, N. (2012). Granny and the robots: Ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(1), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9234-6

Sorell, T. & Draper, H. (2014). Robot carers, ethics, and older people. Ethics and Information Technology, 16(3), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-014-9344-7

Sparrow, R. (2002). The march of the robot dogs. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(4), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021386708994

Sparrow, R. (2016). Robots in aged care: a dystopian future? AI and Society, 31(4), 445–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0625-4

Sullins, J. P. (2012). Robots, love, and sex: The ethics of building a love machine. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 3(4), 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.31

Terkeş, N. ve Bektaş, H. (2016). Yaşlı sağlığı ve teknoloji kullanımı. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi (DEUHFED), 9(4), 153–159.

Turja, T., Van Aerschot, L., Särkikoski, T., & Oksanen, A. (2018). Finnish healthcare professionals’ attitudes towards robots: Reflections on a population sample. Nursing Open, 5(3), 300-309. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.138

Turja, T., Aaltonen, I., Taipale, S., & Oksanen, A. (2020). Robot acceptance model for care (RAM-care): A principled approach to the intention to use care robots. Information & Management, 57(5), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103220

Türkeli, E. (2021). Toplum 5.0 döneminde yaşlı bakım yönetimi. G. İ. Sönmeztürk Bolatan (Ed.), Endüstri 5.0 – Dijital Toplum içinde (s. 153–174). İstanbul: Ekin Basım Yayın Dağıtım.

Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. (2015). Zaman kullanım araştırması 2014–2015: Yaşlı bakımı ve sıklığının cinsiyete göre dağılımı [Veri seti]. Erişim adresi: https://veriportali.tuik.gov.tr/tr/statistical-themes?q=ya%C5%9Fl%C4%B1 (Erişim tarihi: 20.02.2026).

Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. (2024a). Yıllara, yaş grubuna ve cinsiyete göre nüfus, genel nüfus sayımları – Adrese Dayalı Nüfus Kayıt Sistemi (ADNKS) [Veri seti]. Erişim adresi: https://veriportali.tuik.gov.tr/tr/databrowser/tuik/categories/11/11_1/11_1_1/TR,DF_ADNKS_T16,1.0 (Erişim tarihi: 20.02.2026).

Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. (2024b). Bölgesel gayrisafi yurt içi hasıla (GSYH), il düzeyinde [Veri seti]. Erişim adresi: https://veriportali.tuik.gov.tr (Erişim tarihi: 20.02.2026).

Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. (2025). İstatistiklerle yaşlılar, 2024 [Elektronik bülten]. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Istatistiklerle-Yaslilar-2024-54079 (Erişim tarihi: 20.02.2026).

van Kemenade, M. A. M., Konijn, E. A., & Hoorn, J. F. (2015). Robots humanize care: Moral concerns versus witnessed benefits for the elderly. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Health Informatics (HEALTHINF 2015) (pp. 648–653). https://doi.org/10.5220/0005287706480653

van Wynsberghe, A. (2013). Designing robots for care: Care centered value-sensitive design. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(2), 407-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9343-6

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Verelst, L. (2019). Technology adoption of service robots in the elderly care sector (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Ghent Üniversitesi, Gent, Belçika.

Weßel, M., Ellerich-Groppe, N., & Schweda, M. (2023). Gender stereotyping of robotic systems in eldercare: An exploratory analysis of ethical problems and possible solutions. International Journal of Social Robotics, 15(11), 1963–1976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00854-x

Yamazaki, R., Nishio, S., Nagata, Y., Satake, Y., Suzuki, M., Kanemoto, H. ... Ikeda, M. (2023). Long-term effect of the absence of a companion robot on older adults: A preliminary pilot study. Frontiers in Computer Science, 5, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1129506

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Yin, R. K. (2016). Qualitative research from start to finish (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.