Symbolic Interaction and the Symbolic Codes of Turkish Modernization in the Context of Political Modernization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63556/tisej.2025.1751Keywords:
Symbolic interaction, political symbol, modernization, Türkiye, RebuplicAbstract
This study analyzes the modernization process that emerged during the founding of the Republic of Türkiye through symbols such as women, the alphabet reform, and the hat, based on symbolic interaction theory. Political symbols are effective tools in the interpretation of ideology, identity, values, and political attitudes within society. The Republic of Türkiye also resorted to various symbols while severing its cultural ties with the past and creating a new political culture program within the framework of its modernization goals. In this context, women were used as a symbol of social transformation in the effort to become Westernized. The alphabet reform was designed to create a new form of communication and transform cultural memory symbolically. With the introduction of compulsory hat-wearing, the hat became a political symbol and was accepted as the visual symbol of the modern individual. Symbols are polyphonic, multi-meaningful, and contextual. The symbol of women, which is examined in this study as a symbol of modernization, and the statements examined in the context of the Alphabet Reform and the Hat Law reveal the multiple meanings of symbols. These symbols have been used as both persuasive and coercive tools to instill the idea of modernization in society. Thus, they have served as powerful political symbols that express the difference between the traditional and the modern, while also highlighting the distinction between East and West. In this context, the study emphasizes the multiplicity of meanings of symbols and selects three of the many representations used in Turkish modernization as primary examples. It then discusses how political transformation and identity construction were achieved through these symbols.
References
Ahmad, F. (2009). Modern Türkiye’nin Oluşumu (8.Basım). İstanbul: Kaynak Yayınları.
Akşin, S. (2010). Kısa Türkiye Tarihi. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
Aslan, S. (2022). Symbolic Politics and Contention in the Turkish Republic. G. M. Tezcür (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Turkish Politics içinde (ss. 387–406). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ateş, T. (2010). Türk Devrim Tarihi (6. Basım). İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Baert, P.(2005). Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Baker, P. L. (1986). The Fez İn Turkey: A Symbol of Modernization?. Costume, 20(1), 72-85.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. California: University of California Press.
Bozaslan, B. M. (2013). Modernleşme ve Eğitim: Türkiye’de Modern Eğitimin İnşası (1923-1938). (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
Bozdoğan, S. (2001). Modernism and Nation Building: Turkish Architectural Culture in the Early Republic. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Choudhury, E. (2004). The Politics of Symbols and the Symbolization of 9/11. The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences, 21(1), 74-96.
Cohen, A. (1979). Political Symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 8, 87–113.
Cumhuriyet Ansiklopedisi: 1923-1940. (2003). Cilt: 1. 4. Basım. Yayın Kurulu: Hasan Ersel, Ahmet Kuyaş, Ahmet Oktay, Mete Tuncay. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi.
Edelman, M. J. (1964). The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
Ertugay, F., (2021). Sarık'tan Fes'e, Fes'ten Şapka'ya Gâvurluk Asrilik Tartışmaları ya da Modernliğin Eşiği Olarak Biçim. Ertugay, F. (Ed.), Türk Modernleşmesi Nesneler ve Semboller içinde (ss.17-39). Konya: Çizgi Kitabevi.
Eryılmaz, B. (2017). Tanzimat ve Yönetimde Modernleşme. İstanbul: İşaret Yayınları.
Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
Griffin, E. M. (2012). Symbolic Interactionism of George Herbert Mead. E. M. Griffin, A. M. Ledbetter, & G. G. Sparks (Eds.), A First Look at Communication Theory içinde (8.Baskı., ss. 54–66). Columbus: McGraw-Hill.
Göle, N. (1991). Modern Mahrem. Metis Yayınları: İstanbul
Göle, N. (1996). The Forbidden Modern: Civilization and Veiling. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Gül, S. S., Alican, A., ve Gümüşoğlu, F. (2014). Cumhuriyetin Aydınlanma Sembolleri: Kadınlar ve Köy Enstitüleri. MSGSÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10, 89-114.
Hall, P. M. (1972). A Symbolic Interactionist Analysis of Politics. Sociological Inquiry, 42(3-4), 35-75.
Hall, S. (Ed.). (1997). Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage Publications in association with The Open University.
Hanioğlu, Ş. (1985). Batıcılık. TCTA. Cilt: 5. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Hart, K. (1999). Images and Aftermaths: The Use and Contextualization of Atatürk Imagery in Political Debates in Turkey. Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 22(1), 66–84.
Helle, H. J. (2005). Symbolic Interaction and Verstehen (Vol. 4). New York: Peter Lang.
James, W. (1948). Essays in Pragmatism. New York: Hafner Publishing Company.
Järvinen, M. (2020). Symbolic Interactionism as Analytical Tradition. M. Järvinen ve N. Mik-Meyer (Eds.), Qualitative Analysis: Eight Approaches for the Social Sciences içinde (ss. 27–50). London: SAGE Publications.
Karakaş, M. (2022). Türk Modernleşmesi Üzerine Değerlendirmeler. Sosyologca, 24, 109- 120.
Karpat, K. H. (2020). Kısa Türkiye Tarihi 1800-2012 (10. Basım). İstanbul: Timaş Yayınları.
Kertzer, D. I. (1988). Ritual, Politics, and Power. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kırpık, C. (2007). Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nda Modernleşme Sancıları, Fes-Şapka Çatışması. Toplumsal Tarih, 162, 14-22.
Kısıklı, E. (2010). Harf İnkılabı’nın Türk ve Dünya Basınındaki Yankıları. Erdem, (56), 115–160.
Klatch, R. E. (1988). Of Meanings and Masters: Political Symbolism and Symbolic Action. Polity 21(1), 137–154.
Lewis, B. (1968). The Emergence of Modern Turkey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mardin, Ş. (2021). Türk Modernleşmesi. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Mead, G. H., (1913). The Social Self. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 10(14), 374-380.
Mead, G. H. (1962). Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
Mik Meyer, N. (2020). Symbolic Interactionism, Stigma and Othering. M. Järvinen ve N. Mik Meyer (Eds.), Qualitative Analysis: Eight Approaches for the Social Sciences içinde (ss. 51–72). London: SAGE Publications.
Pascale, C. M. (2011). Cartographies of Knowledge: Exploring Qualitative Epistemologies. London: SAGE Publications.
Platt, J. (1996). A History of Sociological Research Methods in America, 1920–1960. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Reynolds, L. T.(2003). Intellectual Precursors. L.T.Reynolds ve N.J.Herman-Kinney (Eds.), Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism içinde (ss. 39–58). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Rose, A. (1962). A Systematic Summary Of Symbolic Interation Theory. Arnold Rose (Ed.). Human Behavior and Social Processes içinde (ss.3-19). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Sarıkoyuncu Değerli, E. (2009). Amerikan Basınında Türk Harf ve Dil Devrimi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23, 1-5.
Shissler, H. A. (2004). Beauty is Nothing to be Shamed of: Beauty Contests as Tools of Women’s Liberation in Early Republican Turkey. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa, and the Middle East 24. 1, 107–122.
Tazegül, M. (2005). Modernleşme Sürecinde Türkiye. İstanbul: Babil Yayınları.
Theiler, T. (2017). Political Symbolism. F. M. Moghaddam (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Political Behavior içinde (ss. 633–634). SAGE Publications.
Tunaya, T. Z. (1983). Batılılaşmada Temel Araştırmalar ve Yaklaşımlar. Cumhuriyet Dönemi Türkiye Ansiklopedisi, Gen.Yön. Murat Belge, C.1. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Tunaya, T. Z. (2016). Türkiye'nin Siyasi Hayatında Batılılaşma Hareketleri (3. Basım). İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Zaslavska, O. (2022). Symbolic Aspect of Politics. Sworld Us Conference Proceedings, 103–107.
Zürcher, E. J. (2017). Turkey: A Modern History (revised edition). I.B. Tauris.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Third Sector Social Economic Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
