AB Ülkelerinde Yapay Zekâ Tabanlı Sürdürülebilirlik: Yapay Zekâ İnovasyonları, İnsan Sermayesi ve Karbon Verimliliği Üzerine Kantil Regresyon Analizi

Yazarlar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63556/tisej.2025.1534

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Karbon Verimliliği- İnsan Sermayesi- Yapay Zeka- Kantil Regresyon- Avrupa Birliği

Özet

Bu çalışma, Avrupa Birliği (AB) ülkelerinde yapay zekâ (YZ) inovasyonlarının ve insan sermayesinin karbon verimliliği üzerindeki heterojen etkilerini incelemekte, özellikle yükseköğretim ve veri okuryazarlığı gibi değişkenlerin aracılık rollerine odaklanmaktadır. 2000–2023 dönemini kapsayan, 27 AB ülkesine ait dengesiz panel veri seti kullanılarak yapılan analizde, karbon verimliliğinin koşullu dağılımı boyunca farklılıkları yakalayabilmek amacıyla kantil regresyon yöntemi uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, anlamlı doğrusal olmayan ilişkileri ortaya koymaktadır: YZ inovasyonları, düşük kantilde (Q25) karbon verimliliğini olumlu yönde etkilerken, üst kantillerde (Q75 ve Q90) bu etkinin negatife döndüğü görülmektedir; bu durum azalan getiriler olasılığına işaret etmektedir. Benzer şekilde, yükseköğretim yalnızca alt kantillerde karbon verimliliğini artırırken, YZ ve eğitim etkileşim terimi dağılımın üst ucunda anlamlı ve pozitif hale gelmekte, bu da yüksek performanslı bağlamlarda tamamlayıcı bir ilişki olduğunu göstermektedir. Buna karşın, YZ ve veri okuryazarlığı arasındaki etkileşim 75. yüzdelik dilime kadar negatif ve anlamlı kalmakta, bu da dijital becerilerin tek başına teknolojik ilerlemenin çevresel verimliliğe dönüşmesi için yeterli olmayabileceğini ima etmektedir. Bu bulgular, özellikle karbon verimliliğini artırmayı hedefleyen ekonomilerde, teknolojik gelişimi desteklerken insan sermayesi temellerini de güçlendirmeye yönelik uyarlanmış yeşil-dijital politika stratejilerinin önemini vurgulamaktadır.

Kaynaklar

Akram, R., Chen, F., Khalid, F., Huang, G., & Irfan, M. (2021). Heterogeneous effects of energy efficiency and renewable energy on economic growth of BRICS countries: A fixed effect panel quantile regression analysis. Energy, 215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119019

Akyüz, Hayriye Esra (2023), “CO2 Emisyonu ve Birincil Enerji Tüketimi Arasındaki İlişkinin Kantil Regresyon Modeli ile İncelenmesi”, Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 11 (2023) 1529-1545

Alsayegh, M. F., Rahman, R. A., & Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093910

Asian Disaster Preparedness Center, Labelle, R., Center, A. D. P., & Labelle, R. (2013). ICT, Climate Change and Green Growth. February.

Cassiman, B., Golovko, E., & Martínez-Ros, E. (2010). Innovation, exports and productivity. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28(4), 372–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2010.03.005

Chang, H. (2023). Do Heterogeneous Environmental Policies Improve Environmental Quality While Promoting Economic Growth? Sustainability, 15(2), 1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021162

Chen, S., Piao, X., Xie, J., & Managi, S. (2025). Human capital and regional disparities: Advancing accounting frameworks with education, health, and population dynamics. PLOS ONE, 20(3), e0315166. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315166

Chishti, M. Z., Salam, M., Xaisongkham, S., & Du, A. M. (2025). Influence of green ICT and socioeconomic factors on sustainable development: Evidence from Chinese provinces. Research in International Business and Finance, 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102624

Dai, D., Fan, Y., Wang, G., & Xie, J. (2022). Digital Economy, R&D Investment, and Regional Green Innovation—Analysis Based on Provincial Panel Data in China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14116508

Dechezleprêtre, A., Martin, R., & Mohnen, M. (2013). Knowledge spillovers from clean and dirty technologies: a patent citation analysis. http://www.lse.ac.uk/grantham.

Erdem, C., Oruç, E., Atar, C., & Bağcı, H. (2023). The mediating effect of digital literacy in the relationship between media literacy and digital citizenship. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 4875–4891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11354-4

European Commission. (2023). The European Green Deal. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en

European Commission. (2023). The European Green Deal. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en

European Environment Agency. (2023). Trends and projections in Europe 2023. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/trends-and-projections-2023

Eurostat. (2023). Digital skills statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/

Eurostat. (2023). Greenhouse gas emissions by country and sector. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat

Eurostat. (2024). Artificial intelligence use in enterprises. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat

Habiba, U., Xinbang, C., & Anwar, A. (2022). Do green technology innovations, financial development, and renewable energy use help to curb carbon emissions? Renewable Energy, 193, 1082–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2022.05.084

Hao, L. N., Umar, M., Khan, Z., & Ali, W. (2021). Green growth and low carbon emission in G7 countries: How critical the network of environmental taxes, renewable energy and human capital is? Science of the Total Environment, 752, 141853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141853

Hau, L., Zhu, H., Huang, R., & Ma, X. (2020). Heterogeneous dependence between crude oil price volatility and China’s agriculture commodity futures: Evidence from quantile-on-quantile regression. Energy, 213, 118781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118781

Hung, N. T. (2023). Green investment, financial development, digitalization and economic sustainability in Vietnam: Evidence from a quantile-on-quantile regression and wavelet coherence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122185

Husin, A., Helmi, H., Nengsih, Y. K., & Rendana, M. (2025). Environmental education in schools: sustainability and hope. Discover Sustainability, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00837-2

IPCC. (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-synthesis

Khan, S. A. R., Yu, Z., Ridwan, I. L., Irshad, A. ur R., Ponce, P., & Tanveer, M. (2023). Energy efficiency, carbon neutrality and technological innovation: a strategic move towards green economy. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja , 36(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2140306

Li, J., & Imran, A. (2025). Sustainable Transitions: Navigating Green Technologies, Clean Energy, Economic Growth, and Human Capital for a Greener Future. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083446

Liu, H., Zhang, J., & Lei, H. (2023). Crowding in or crowding out? The effect of imported environmentally sound technologies on indigenous green innovation. Journal of Environmental Management, 345. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2023.118579

Majerník, M., Chovancová, J., Drábik, P., & Štofková, Z. (2023). Environmental Technological Innovations and the Sustainability of their Development. Ecological Engineering and Environmental Technology, 24(4), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/162708

Meiwen, S., Ming, J., & Mengyu, L. (2025). Education, technology and high-quality economic development. International Review of Financial Analysis, 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104143

OECD. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Society: Environment and Sustainability. https://www.oecd.org/going-digital/ai/

Ozkan, O., Haruna, R. A., ALOLA, A. A., Ghardallou, W., & Usman, O. (2023). Investigating the nexus between economic complexity and energy-related environmental risks in the USA: Empirical evidence from a novel multivariate quantile-on-quantile regression. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 65, 382–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STRUECO.2023.03.010

Radu, L. D. (2016). Determinants of green ICT adoption in organizations: A theoretical perspective. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 8, Issue 8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080731

Saba, C. S., Ngepah, N., & Odhiambo, N. M. (2025). The Nexus Between ICT Diffusion, Financial Development, Industrialization and Economic Growth: Evidence from Sub-Saharan African Countries. Journal of African Business. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2025.2451550

Shabir, M., Hussain, I., Işık, Ö., Razzaq, K., & Mehroush, I. (2023). The role of innovation in environmental-related technologies and institutional quality to drive environmental sustainability. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1174827

Škare, M., Gavurova, B., & Porada-Rochon, M. (2024). Digitalization and carbon footprint: Building a path to a sustainable economic growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 199, 123045. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2023.123045

Soto, G. H. (2024). The role of high human capital and green economies in environmental sustainability in the Asia-Pacific region, 1990–2022. Management of Environmental Quality. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-01-2024-0052

Tsimisaraka, R. S. M., Xiang, L., Andrianarivo, A. R. N. A., Josoa, E. Z., Khan, N., Hanif, M. S., Khurshid, A., & Limongi, R. (2023). Impact of Financial Inclusion, Globalization, Renewable Energy, ICT, and Economic Growth on CO2 Emission in OBOR Countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086534

UNEP. (2022). Emissions Gap Report 2022: The Closing Window. United Nations Environment Programme. https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2022

UNESCO. (2023). Digital Literacy for Sustainable Development. https://www.unesco.org

UNSDG. (2023). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/

UNSDG. (2023). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/

Wolde-Rufael, Y., & Mulat-weldemeskel, E. (2023). Effectiveness of environmental taxes and environmental stringent policies on CO2 emissions: the European experience. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(6), 5211–5239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02262-1

Wu, R., Xie, Z., Wang, J., & Wang, S. (2025). Estimating the environmental Kuznets curve and its influencing factors of CO2 emissions: Insights from development stages and rebound effects. Applied Geography, 174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2024.103475

Yağlıkara, Aykut, (2025), Enerji Verimliliği ve Çevresel Vergiler İskandinav Ülkelerinde Ekolojik Ayak İzini Azaltmada Etkili mi? Panel Kantil Regresyon Analizi”, Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi Third Sector Social Economic Review 60(1) 2025, 366-381

Yao, W., Liu, L., Fujii, H., & Li, L. (2024). Digitalization and net-zero carbon: The role of industrial robots towards carbon dioxide emission reduction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141820

Yao, Y., Ivanovski, K., Inekwe, J., & Smyth, R. (2020). Human capital and CO2 emissions in the long run. Energy Economics, 91, 104907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104907

Zhang, T., Ma, Z., & Shang, Y. (2023). Higher Education, Technological Innovation, and Green Development—Analysis Based on China’s Provincial Panel Data. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054311

Yayınlanmış

22-09-2025

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

AĞAN ÇELİK, B. (2025). AB Ülkelerinde Yapay Zekâ Tabanlı Sürdürülebilirlik: Yapay Zekâ İnovasyonları, İnsan Sermayesi ve Karbon Verimliliği Üzerine Kantil Regresyon Analizi. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 60(3), 2543–2560. https://doi.org/10.63556/tisej.2025.1534

Sayı

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Benzer Makaleler

<< < 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 > >> 

Bu makale için ayrıca gelişmiş bir benzerlik araması başlat yapabilirsiniz.