The Prison Radicalization Strategies of Feto Prisoners: A Comparison Between Türkiye And Europe
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63556/tisej.2025.1685Keywords:
FETO, Radicalization, Prisons, Turkiye, EuropeAbstract
This study comparatively analyzes the radicalization strategies of Fetullah Terrorist Organization (FETO) inmates in Turkey and Europe. Prisons are approached not only as punitive environments but also as spaces where ideological identities and organizational loyalties are reproduced. The analysis is guided by Moghaddam’s Staircase to Terrorism model and Kruglanski’s Significance Quest Theory. Findings show that in Europe, the limited number of FETO inmates restricts collective organizational restructuring; however, individual radicalization persists through political-prisoner identity and victimhood narratives. In Turkey, the post–July 15 shift toward F-type prisons, strict communication controls, psychosocial services, and spiritual guidance programs has significantly impeded organizational continuity. The study concludes that prison radicalization is a multidimensional phenomenon and highlights the need for stronger rehabilitation programs and enhanced international cooperation to support policymaking in this field.
References
Anadolu Ajansı. (2019, March 5). FETÖ sanıkları koğuşlarda haberleşiyor. Anadolu Ajansı.
Anadolu Ajansı. (2019, March 5). FETÖ sanıklarının birbirleriyle irtibatı kesilmeli. Anadolu Ajansı.
Anadolu Ajansı. (2018, October 12). FETÖ sanıklarına Gülen’den mektuplar gönderilmiş. Anadolu Ajansı.
Anadolu Ajansı. (2017, August 18). Amaç, FETÖ mensuplarının çözülmesini engellemek. Anadolu Ajansı. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/turkiye/amac-feto-mensuplarinin-cozulmesini-engellemek/887123
Balta Paker, E. (2003). Cezaevlerinde siyasal örgütlenme ve gündelik hayat: Koğuş deneyimi. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Council of Europe. (1996). Report to the Turkish Government on the visit to Turkey carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Çakır, R. (2018). Cezaevlerinde manevi rehberlik ve dini istismar eden örgütlerle mücadele. İlahiyat Tetkikleri Dergisi, 50(1), 45–68.
Daily Sabah. (2023, May 17). FETÖ fugitives exploit European courts to avoid justice in Turkey. Daily Sabah.
Daily Sabah. (2025, June 9). ECtHR faults Turkey for withholding inmate’s letter to fiancée. Daily Sabah.
Daily Sabah. (2016, November 4). FETÖ inmates develop secret hand signals for communication in prison. Daily Sabah.
Demiralp, S. (2016). The AKP–Gülen conflict and Turkey’s failed coup. Mediterranean Politics, 21(1), 1–7.
Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı. (2017). Cezaevlerinde manevi rehberlik faaliyetleri raporu. Ankara: Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı Yayınları.
Ebaugh, H. R. (2010). The Gülen movement: A sociological analysis of a civic movement rooted in moderate Islam. Springer.
EEAS. (2022, March 17). EU supports training of Turkish prison staff to ensure high standards of care for prisoners. European External Action Service. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/delegations/t%C3%BCrkiye/eu-supports-training-turkish-prison-staff-ensure-high-standards-care-prisoners-0_en
Esen, B., & Gümüşçü, Ş. (2017). Turkey: How the coup failed. Journal of Democracy, 28(1), 59–73.
EPTA. (2023). Turkey: Radicalisation prevention training in prisons. European Penitentiary Training Academy Network.
European Parliament. (2023). Prisons and detention conditions in the EU (PE 741.374). European Parliamentary Research Service.
FIIAPP. (2021, September 1). Turkey commits to preventing radicalization in prisons. Fundación Internacional y para Iberoamérica de Administración y Políticas Públicas. https://www.fiap.gob.es/en/noticias/turkish-prisons-work-to-prevent-prisoner-radicalisation
Fitzgerald, S. T. (2017). Conceptualizing and understanding the Gülen movement. Sociology Compass, 11(3), https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12461
Greene, A. (2024). Yalçınkaya v Türkiye: ECtHR judgment and its implications. European Human Rights Law Review, 2024(5), 438–447.
Hendrick, J. D. (2013). Gülen: The ambiguous politics of market Islam in Turkey and the world. NYU Press.
Human Rights Watch. (2001). Small group isolation in F-type prisons and the violent transfers of prisoners to Sincan, Kandıra, and Edirne prisons. Human Rights Watch Report.
Karagöl, E. T. (2017). F-tipleri: Cezaevi reformu ve güvenlik politikaları. Ankara: SETA Yayınları.
Kars Güncel. (2016, September 14). Kars Cezaevi’nde FETÖ sanıklarına gizli SIM kart operasyonu. Kars Güncel.
Kruglanski, A. W., Bélanger, J. J., & Gunaratna, R. (2019). The three pillars of radicalization: Needs, narratives, and networks. Oxford University Press.
Lalich, J. (2004). Bounded choice: True believers and charismatic cults. University of California Press.
Lifton, R. J. (1989). Thought reform and the psychology of totalism. UNC Press.
Moghaddam, F. M. (2005). The staircase to terrorism: A psychological exploration. American Psychologist, 60(2), 161–169, https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.2.161
Neumann, P. R. (2013). The trouble with radicalization. International Affairs, 89(4), 873–893.
Neumann, P. R. (2010). Prisons and terrorism: Radicalisation and de-radicalisation in 15 countries. International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation (ICSR).
Reuters. (2018, April 23). Bosnia court rejects extradition of Gulenist to Turkey. Reuters.
Schmid, A. P. (2013). Radicalisation, de-radicalisation, counter-radicalisation: A conceptual discussion and literature review. ICCT Research Paper.
Sedgwick, M. (2010). The concept of radicalization as a source of confusion. Terrorism and Political Violence, 22(4), 479–494.
Silke, A. (Ed.). (2014). Prisons, terrorism and extremism: Critical issues in management, radicalisation and reform. Routledge.
Tee, C. (2018). The Gülen movement in London and the politics of public engagement: Producing “good Islam” before and after 15 July. Politics, Religion & Ideology, 19(1), 109–122.
Tittensor, D. (2014). The house of service: The Gülen movement and Islam’s third way. Oxford University Press.
TRT Haber. (2020, July 15). FETÖ Avrupa’da propaganda faaliyetlerini sürdürüyor. TRT Haber.
Turkish Minute. (2025a, January 12). Germany blocks extradition of Gülen-linked teachers.
Turkish Minute. (2025b, February 4). Court rulings strengthen FETÖ asylum claims in Europe.
Yavuz, M. H., & Balcı, B. (Eds.). (2018). Turkey’s July 15th coup: What happened and why. University of Utah Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Third Sector Social Economic Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
